Halacha2goThe one minute halacha

Making the Case for a Muchzak

If a person is holding an object or has an object in their possession that someone else claims, the principle of muchzak comes into play. Halachah states that the muchzak (a person who is in possession of something) is the de facto owner: Chazakah kol mah shetachas yad adam shelo (the halachic assumption is that whatever in a person’s possession belongs to them). There are many rules that must be studied to determine exactly what constitutes being a muchzak in a particular dispute—but that is beyond the scope of this discussion.

This principle is based on the sevara (logical principle) that achazukei inshi b’ganvei lo machzikinan (that [the average] person is not assumed to be a thief), to have come into possession of goods by thievery. The general principle to be applied here is, lo shavkas chayei l’chol birya (it would be impossible for people to live) if all their belongings were constantly threatened.

This halachic principle is also based on the pasuk (verse) in Parashas Mishpatim: Mi ba’al devarim yigash aleihem (the plaintiff in a case should approach them [the court]), and on the words of the Gemara, “The one who is in pain goes to the doctor.” The burden of proof is on the one who wants to dispute the muchzak’s claim, as it says in the Mishnah, hamotzi mechavero alav harayah (one who wants to remove something from his friend’s possession, the burden of proof is on them [the claimant]).

In general, safek mammon l’kula, (when it comes to money matters we are lenient) and allow it to remain with the muchzak—but when there is a safek (doubt) of an issur d’oraisa (Torah prohibition), we must err on the side of caution. The question begs to be asked: since the item or money in dispute may actually be stolen, mustn’t we be strict in suspecting gezeilah (theft)?

There are many reasons why gezeilah is not an issue here. One explanation is that since the concept of muchzak is rooted in Torah, it applies also to the rules that determine what defines stolen property in the first place. Some answer that there is a special halachah regarding gezeilah: if in doubt about who the rightful owner is, we rule leniently and leave it with the muchzak. An alternative approach is that since it's a safek of gezeilah for both parties, we are better off leaving it with the muchzak.

(See more halachos that deal with a muchzak in Halachah #691, on the concept of “kim li,” and Halachah #427 on chazakah regarding inheritance.)